SSM

 Now days, There are so many SSM appeared. And small individuall supermarket is closing because of that reason. So so many people said to protect the small supermarket and against the SSM`s expand to give them penalty. I agree about the penalty that give to SSM but I think to against the apperance itself and to give very many penalty is wrong. I think , Being made SSM activate competition so small supermarket wants to survive they must upgrade their survice and their product. Sometime small or individuall business owners just want to protect, although they do not effort to upgrade survice and the quality of product.

For example when I lived in cheon-an that live apart from my own family, I needed so many thing like soap, food, cookies and so on. But there isn`t exsited SSM or convenience store in there. Only exsisted individuall small supermarket. So I usually went there for buying what I need but I couldn`t buy enough. Because that supermarket is so small and the owner looks very lazy man. He always lay in front of TV. and the owner doesn`t know about the products that I need, and that isn`t only my case. Friends or neighbor ,lived close to me, said "there is a small product exsit and in that products, that supermarket doesn`t have to we know, and we need."
So I usually bought the products that I need in SSM near by my family home. I bought it and took it to cheon-an took on the subway and bus. It`s so hard to me so I think sometimes "I hope that or convenience store is made near my room."

Like that example, small supermarket doesn`t upgrade their store and service.
Of coure some of small supermarket owners are very dilligent and they think so many good ideas that I can`t thinking. I saw that cases in TV or when I walk the near University. They effort to survive and sell so many kinds of product like SSM. And then if they earn the money so much they become a SSM.
And near small supermarket against making SSM they said  "If SSM is made near my supermarket, we must close. Because we don`t have any ways to survive." I think that is pretext.

Huge company`s SSM like Lotte or GS or Homeplus must has penalty because that is not competition.
But all SSM isn`t huge company`s brend. Some SSM is started small supermarket and they efforted to survive in their market. I agree Huge company`s SSM is gave penalty for symbiosis. But I think all SSM doesn`t give damage. I think we think SSM give competition for upgrade survice and quality of product.

GMO

I read about the GMO on news paper, before. It said it will be a certain and good way to slove the poor's hunger. And most of the people agree about that article. But when I listened and watched this presentation, become to I don't and I can't agree the GMO.
I think changing nature laws is very dangerous. Nature laws, carnivore must eat the meat and herbivore must eat crops, is made by the God and the laws has the reason. For example when the herbivore eating the meat that mixed crops, disease appeared. That os mad cow disease.
So I'm very worried about the appearance of new disease. Because we challenged the God and broken the law. I think changing gene is same case that mad cow disease.
Maybe we didn't and don't even won't know about side-effect. But certainly it become to appear. So I don't agree GMO

Design of seoul

It is very interesting title because of a vote of Seoul City mayor.Two of candidates are promised that stop the some of Design of Seoul like Han-river Renaissance or Dongdaemoon. So what is the Design of Seoul?
I don`t know what Design of Seoul is exactly. And that`s problems, too. I became knowing about that in this presentation.
In presentation, discussion question had so many opinion. Espesially we choose the well and worst Design of Seoul. In our group, the green, proffessor Morgan joined us. when the question was gave us, we all areed that Dongdaemoon is worst design. Because it likes in case of Shanghai tower. Close future, when it completion, it can be looks nice. Shanghai tower looks very nice but these days it`s very foolish. Morgan said and we all agreed. But the best design is not like worst. Morgan said best is Gwanghwamoon park and I said Han-river is best.
I like Gwanghwamoon park, and I go there sometimes because I have a part time job near there. When finished the work, then I walk around the park. Gwanghwamoon is good to me, feel nice.
But I choose the best design to Hanriver. Because Han-river is very comfotable park when we use and have some rest in there. It changed so many part than before. But it doesn`t matter. I think the design is better than before. So I wanna choose the best design is Han-river.

OTC...

Today, OTC presentation is very good to me. Because I have interesting about that title.
I think it`s very dangerous when the madicine is sold by SSM or convenience store but it need to. So if the medicine is sold by SSM or convenience store, Korea goverment must make a law hader than these days.

So many pharmacy against the OTC. They argue that if OTC start, medicine`s side effect accident much more from these days. It`s not wrong argument but I think that is not important reason to pharmacy. The important reason is they protect their profit. So I have a lot of thinking about last question. 
the last question that OTC effects badly to small pharmacy, I don`t agree that our group opinion. In our group`s opinion is OTC  badly effeted by SSM. However I think small pharmacy has ragulary profits like prescription madicine. Nonprescription madicine isn`t big part of their profit. Because it isn`t expensive and the hospital can`t sell the madicine so the madicin is must sold by pharmacy. 

So I agree OTC very much.

Journal (First)

On September 30, Proffesor Morgan had present. The title is overfishing.

These days, population have grown up so much, at that result companys need to so many produts depending on the population. And this case`s product is fish. Following the population, catching lots of fish is perhaps a natural result. But the problem is some company doing overfishing for their profits. I realized and knew overfishing`s seriousness and the problem that effected to Ecosystem.
 But I can`t agree about second discussion question. In my group, generally group members said "Destoried Ecosystem is more serious problem than human problem." So we presented like that. However I think human problem is more serious problem than destroied Ecosystem.
 Because every human`s first goal is survival. So, for surviving, human do destruction other natual. For example, if overfishing stopped by any ways, many people lose their job. Espesially the poors that living in poor country. Than what can they do for survival? They will find other job and destroy other natual.
The natual is very important for human survive. But we must think like this. "It is imperative on the earth to human survive in the earth."