On September 30, Proffesor Morgan had present. The title is overfishing.
These days, population have grown up so much, at that result companys need to so many produts depending on the population. And this case`s product is fish. Following the population, catching lots of fish is perhaps a natural result. But the problem is some company doing overfishing for their profits. I realized and knew overfishing`s seriousness and the problem that effected to Ecosystem.
But I can`t agree about second discussion question. In my group, generally group members said "Destoried Ecosystem is more serious problem than human problem." So we presented like that. However I think human problem is more serious problem than destroied Ecosystem.
Because every human`s first goal is survival. So, for surviving, human do destruction other natual. For example, if overfishing stopped by any ways, many people lose their job. Espesially the poors that living in poor country. Than what can they do for survival? They will find other job and destroy other natual.
The natual is very important for human survive. But we must think like this. "It is imperative on the earth to human survive in the earth."
I disagree with you because if there is no nature, we can not exist.
답글삭제People is not landlord in the earth. We can peaceful coexistence with nature.