Now days, There are so many SSM appeared. And small individuall supermarket is closing because of that reason. So so many people said to protect the small supermarket and against the SSM`s expand to give them penalty. I agree about the penalty that give to SSM but I think to against the apperance itself and to give very many penalty is wrong. I think , Being made SSM activate competition so small supermarket wants to survive they must upgrade their survice and their product. Sometime small or individuall business owners just want to protect, although they do not effort to upgrade survice and the quality of product.
For example when I lived in cheon-an that live apart from my own family, I needed so many thing like soap, food, cookies and so on. But there isn`t exsited SSM or convenience store in there. Only exsisted individuall small supermarket. So I usually went there for buying what I need but I couldn`t buy enough. Because that supermarket is so small and the owner looks very lazy man. He always lay in front of TV. and the owner doesn`t know about the products that I need, and that isn`t only my case. Friends or neighbor ,lived close to me, said "there is a small product exsit and in that products, that supermarket doesn`t have to we know, and we need."
So I usually bought the products that I need in SSM near by my family home. I bought it and took it to cheon-an took on the subway and bus. It`s so hard to me so I think sometimes "I hope that or convenience store is made near my room."
Like that example, small supermarket doesn`t upgrade their store and service.
Of coure some of small supermarket owners are very dilligent and they think so many good ideas that I can`t thinking. I saw that cases in TV or when I walk the near University. They effort to survive and sell so many kinds of product like SSM. And then if they earn the money so much they become a SSM.
And near small supermarket against making SSM they said "If SSM is made near my supermarket, we must close. Because we don`t have any ways to survive." I think that is pretext.
Huge company`s SSM like Lotte or GS or Homeplus must has penalty because that is not competition.
But all SSM isn`t huge company`s brend. Some SSM is started small supermarket and they efforted to survive in their market. I agree Huge company`s SSM is gave penalty for symbiosis. But I think all SSM doesn`t give damage. I think we think SSM give competition for upgrade survice and quality of product.
For example when I lived in cheon-an that live apart from my own family, I needed so many thing like soap, food, cookies and so on. But there isn`t exsited SSM or convenience store in there. Only exsisted individuall small supermarket. So I usually went there for buying what I need but I couldn`t buy enough. Because that supermarket is so small and the owner looks very lazy man. He always lay in front of TV. and the owner doesn`t know about the products that I need, and that isn`t only my case. Friends or neighbor ,lived close to me, said "there is a small product exsit and in that products, that supermarket doesn`t have to we know, and we need."
So I usually bought the products that I need in SSM near by my family home. I bought it and took it to cheon-an took on the subway and bus. It`s so hard to me so I think sometimes "I hope that or convenience store is made near my room."
Like that example, small supermarket doesn`t upgrade their store and service.
Of coure some of small supermarket owners are very dilligent and they think so many good ideas that I can`t thinking. I saw that cases in TV or when I walk the near University. They effort to survive and sell so many kinds of product like SSM. And then if they earn the money so much they become a SSM.
And near small supermarket against making SSM they said "If SSM is made near my supermarket, we must close. Because we don`t have any ways to survive." I think that is pretext.
Huge company`s SSM like Lotte or GS or Homeplus must has penalty because that is not competition.
But all SSM isn`t huge company`s brend. Some SSM is started small supermarket and they efforted to survive in their market. I agree Huge company`s SSM is gave penalty for symbiosis. But I think all SSM doesn`t give damage. I think we think SSM give competition for upgrade survice and quality of product.
I agree with your opinion a little. From active competition small supermarkets should try to make good service and upgrade itself. I think some penalty is necessary to big company. You wrote a journal longer.
답글삭제I agree with your idea. Penalty is necessary to huge company. Small market have right to protect their field.
답글삭제I agree with your thinking that SSM is very useful for us. I also experienced that small individual supermarket has only limited products so i didn't have many choices. It was quite uncomfortable.
답글삭제This my correct blog Address, Turki:-
답글삭제http://fcealfagheehturki7301.blogspot.com/
Add me to you list please